My last semester in college, while I was student teaching, I had a class that emphasized different key topics in the field of Deaf Education. One such topic was vocabulary development. We all already knew that students who are deaf/hard of hearing have a lower vocabulary than their same-age hearing peers for a variety of reasons not least of which being their limited access to "incidental learning" that comes from listening to other people's conversations/tv/radio, etc. In our class, we talked about ways to introduce new vocabulary in order to give students a more connected understanding of the new word in its five distinct forms.

In Calc this week, I had my student doing practice AP Free Response questions. One day, after completing a no-calculator free response question requiring justification of responses, I read the justification and was reminded of vocabulary difficulties. The mathematical justification was great, but instead of saying the normal line is perpendicular to the tangent, therefore the slopes are opposite reciprocals, justification was that the slopes are "negatived and flipped." In ASL, it would be an appropriate explanation, because the sign for flip and the sign for reciprocal are the same. This is the class that I have been most conscious about vocabulary! We have had English lessons in the middle of calc class in order to recognize the different forms of words that have the same sign. i.e. differentiate (v.), derivative (n.), differentiable (adj.), derive (v.), etc. The majority of the calc vocabulary (inflection point, slope, tangent and many others) does not have ASL signs, so we do a lot of fingerspelling with the support of written English on the board. I am concerned that this might not be enough.

Any thoughts on how to make vocabulary a more essential part of the curriculum or to get students actively using appropriate terms in writing?

- Picture
- Description/definition
- ASL sign (if applicable)
- English word (in print)
- Fingerspelling of English word

In Calc this week, I had my student doing practice AP Free Response questions. One day, after completing a no-calculator free response question requiring justification of responses, I read the justification and was reminded of vocabulary difficulties. The mathematical justification was great, but instead of saying the normal line is perpendicular to the tangent, therefore the slopes are opposite reciprocals, justification was that the slopes are "negatived and flipped." In ASL, it would be an appropriate explanation, because the sign for flip and the sign for reciprocal are the same. This is the class that I have been most conscious about vocabulary! We have had English lessons in the middle of calc class in order to recognize the different forms of words that have the same sign. i.e. differentiate (v.), derivative (n.), differentiable (adj.), derive (v.), etc. The majority of the calc vocabulary (inflection point, slope, tangent and many others) does not have ASL signs, so we do a lot of fingerspelling with the support of written English on the board. I am concerned that this might not be enough.

Any thoughts on how to make vocabulary a more essential part of the curriculum or to get students actively using appropriate terms in writing?

What about taking the free response questions from earlier this week and writing your own response. Then remove the "technical" vocabulary you used and put it into a word box. Have the students fill in the blanks and then compare the product to their own response. Have a discussion about the similarities and differences.

ReplyDeleteThat's a good idea, Kate. Thanks! I've done some "I write, we write, you write" that worked really well and I meant to blog last month. I didn't think to do a cloze type activity comparing mine/theirs. We did talk about the ASL/English differences and formal tone using specific vocab.

ReplyDeleteThanks again!

No prob! The lack of formal math vocab is very similar to the LD students I work with and the cloze-type activities seem to be a nice bridge from their language to something a little more precise.

ReplyDelete