Skip to main content

We are not Intramural...

Here's an analogy and the most recent joke going around my department:

Some of our kids get upset when they don't get all A's (understandable). My students are not all "on-level". In fact, most of them are not. In English class, they are accessing high school content at modified levels based on their independent and instruction reading levels as determined by the Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI). These reading levels range from pre-Primer through High School, and the teachers adapt their materials accordingly. Students that read at the pre-Primer level can still get a grade of A in English by doing the work and improving their reading and writing skills.

Math is a different beast. Students are learning high school math content. You cannot change the Algebra 1, Algebra 2, or Geometry standards. You can modify the methods used to teach the content. You can create guided notes with picture support for vocabulary and explanations written in language they can access based on their independent reading level. You cannot, though, teach 5th grade content. Factoring trinomials is factoring trinomials.

To break the news to students used to getting straight A's, my colleague uses a sports analogy. She explains to them that math content is the same in public schools as it is in our school. Their grade and understanding reflects how they are doing in comparison to what they know and understand about the standards. The same standards being used in public schools. The sports analogy is this: If you were grading athletic ability, an A would mean you're an expert, the best in the a professional athlete or a gold medalist. A "B" is like a college athlete, C - on a high school sports team. A D or F would be like an intramural/club player, someone not quite good enough to make the team. Students know that they are below level in English, and this analogy helps them understand better their progress in math. We are not trying to bring our students down, but give them a realistic perspective of their achievements. The downside of going to a school where everyone is deaf, is that the only people to compare yourself with are others who are fighting the same language battle as you are.

The joke stemming from this analogy has nothing to do with our students: my colleague and I regularly tell ourselves (especially on rough days...) "We are not Intramural!" We are continuing to look for ways to improve our methods of teaching and assessing. We are trying to make high school math content accessible for our students. We are looking for ways to improve their retention and make math more applicable to their lives. If I get to a point where I don't care about those things and am just going through the motions - I have become intramural. I hope that never happens, but if it starts trending that way, I hope I leave teaching. The kids deserve better than that.


Popular posts from this blog

Reflections and Preparation: A Look Into the Socio-Emotional Learning Goals of a Teacher

* taps mic * Is this on?  I haven't been here in years, but there is so much that I have been reading, thinking about, and planning in the past few days.  I needed to get some of it out.  Maybe this will forever live in drafts, or maybe, just maybe, I'll be brave and #pushsend.

I crawled out from under a rock and started using TweetDeck on my computer last week.  For years I have missed the #MTBoS community, but have felt that it was too overwhelming to keep up with on top of all the typical day to day activities.  Also, I joined Twitter back when I was one of two math teachers at my school.  That community was my lifeline during my first 3 years of teaching.  Now, I have a workroom filled with teachers in real life with whom I can and should collaborate.  The richness and depth of these workroom discussions are not usually the same as what I found online, but it is still critical to support and develop these relationships.

Now comes to the real point of this post: Reflecting …

Confession...I'm planning to use Khan Academy this year

It seems Khan Academy (henceforth referenced as KA) has a pretty bad rap in some math teacher circles.  I understand that the videos are somewhat lacking in the engagement factor, and motivating students with points and badges can seem somewhat elementary.  I also see that KA tends to focus more on a procedure/pattern than actual problem solving. 

All that said, I will be using KA this year in my resource classroom.  I have a group of students that are in my class for numeracy skill building/strategies instruction.  I'm supposed to be teaching them 25 mins/day and allowing them 25 mins/day to work on their homework or classwork.  I have students of all grade and ability levels in one resource class, so lesson planning becomes difficult.  Twenty-five minutes is not a long time when you think about it, seemingly less when you think about real problem solving tasks.

Enter KA.  Each student can be working on exercises related to what their individual math course is or will be addressi…


Here's the deal:  I'm working on curriculum for my school and Algebra 2 is making my eyes cross.  I think the major problem is the state of Virginia is in a transition year between "old" Standards of Learning (SOLs), and "new" ones.  This year is supposed to be the year that we're still teaching and assessing the old SOLs, but we're supposed to teach the new ones, too.  Those of you that teach Algebra 2 already know that there's an enormous amount of information to cover in a short period of time.  To give you context, our school teaches it as a semester-long block course.  There's only so much a brain can handle in one day, though! 

Here's the first draft of my skills list and structure...I'm not sure what to do about the old vs. new SOLs (my skills list is based on the old SOLs because that is what will be assessed).

Note:  Gray items are not included in old or new SOLs but might be necessary for student understanding
Blue items ar…